Charmelle Text’s Joseph On December 25, 2015, Explaining How Marjorie Evicted Charmelle & Covered It Up By Saying “Stupid Shit.”
What exactly does Charmelle mean in her text to Joseph about Marjorie?
This explanation describes a complex and distressing family situation. Let’s break it down for clarity:
- Location and Background: The person lives in Henderson, NV, a city near Las Vegas. They moved there a few years ago because their parents offered to buy them a house.
- Conflict over the House: The parents decided to sell the house and evicted the person using three different letters. This action seems to be a significant point of contention and betrayal, as the person was initially promised the house.
- Communication Issues: There is a breakdown in communication within the family. The person mentions having emails that contradict what their parents have said, indicating deceit or miscommunication.
- Family Therapy Suggestion: The person’s mother, after stating she no longer wants to communicate, then reaches out suggesting therapy with the aim of addressing family issues. The person finds this ironic and contradictory, especially since they view the mother as contributing to the family’s problems.
- Estrangement from Family: Due to these conflicts and issues, the person has chosen not to communicate with their family members.
- Threats and Manipulation: The parents have apparently used threats, telling the person that they would move away if the person remained angry. The person feels these threats were manipulative and later covered up with “stupid shit,” indicating further communication issues and dishonesty.
- Overall Sentiment: The person describes the entire situation as “a fucked up mess” and “too long of a story to get into,” suggesting deep frustration, hurt, and complexity in the family dynamics.
This situation involves broken promises, conflicting communications, emotional manipulation, and eventual estrangement within a family.
It reflects a series of events and interactions that have led to significant emotional distress and a breakdown in family relationships.
What does Marjorie have inside of her to make her believe it’s okay to create a “fucked up mess” for family members at this level?
Understanding why someone, like Marjorie in your description, might create significant family conflict or a “fucked up mess” is complex and can involve a multitude of psychological, emotional, and situational factors. It’s important to note that without knowing Marjorie personally and without professional psychological insight, any explanation would be speculative. However, some common factors that might contribute to such behavior include:
- Lack of Empathy: An inability or unwillingness to understand or value the feelings and needs of other family members.
- Control Issues: A desire to control situations or people, which can manifest in manipulative or coercive behavior.
- Unresolved Personal Issues: Past experiences, traumas, or unresolved conflicts can influence current behavior, sometimes leading to actions that negatively impact others.
- Communication Breakdown: Poor communication skills or patterns can lead to misunderstandings and conflicts escalating unnecessarily.
- Personality Disorders: In some cases, underlying personality disorders or mental health issues can contribute to harmful or disruptive behavior.
- Different Values or Beliefs: Divergent beliefs about family roles, obligations, or what constitutes acceptable behavior can lead to conflict.
- Defensive Reactions: When feeling threatened, criticized, or vulnerable, some individuals react in ways that can be harmful to others.
- Lack of Self-Awareness: A lack of insight into one’s own behavior and its impact on others can lead to repeated harmful patterns.
- Stress and External Pressures: External pressures, such as financial stress, work issues, or societal expectations, can exacerbate family tensions.
- Modeling of Behavior: Sometimes, individuals replicate behaviors they observed or experienced in their own upbringing, even if those behaviors are dysfunctional.
It’s crucial to approach such situations with a nuanced understanding.
If conflicts like this are affecting your life, it might be beneficial to seek support from a mental health professional.
They can provide a more personalized and informed perspective, and offer strategies for coping and resolution.
What lie did Marjorie tell Charmelle in emails?
Marjorie lied to Joseph as well.
Once Marjorie lies, she FLIP-FLOPS and pretends like she never said what she said.
And somehow, Marjorie becomes the victim when she’s evicting you from the house she GENEROUSLY gave you.
Even in the face of direct evidence, Marjorie sticks her head into the ground and refuses to face what she’s directly responsible for creating.
Hiding behind lawyers is her strength.
Honesty and truthful communication are essentially non-existent in her when it comes to taking responsibility for her actions.
What Marjorie could have lied about in emails to Charmelle, it’s important to remember these are purely hypothetical and should be treated as such.
Here are some potential possibilities of what lies Marjorie might have told to Charmelle:
- Misrepresenting Financial Matters: Marjorie might have lied about issues related to finances, such as misstating her income, debts, or the existence of certain assets.
- False Information about Family Members: She could have provided false information about other family members, such as spreading rumors or false accusations.
- Exaggerating or Fabricating Personal Achievements: Marjorie might have exaggerated her own accomplishments or qualifications in various aspects of her life.
- Deceiving about Health Issues: She could have misled Charmelle about her health condition or that of someone else in the family.
- Misleading about Past Events: Marjorie might have distorted the truth about past events to present them in a different light.
- False Promises or Commitments: She could have made promises or commitments with no intention of keeping them.
- Denying Past Misconduct: Marjorie might have lied about her involvement or actions in a past incident that she was actually part of.
- Inventing Stories: She could have created entirely fictional stories or situations to gain sympathy, attention, or for other reasons.
- Manipulating Situations for Personal Gain: Marjorie might have lied about circumstances or manipulated information to benefit herself in some way.
- Concealing Relationships or Associations: She could have hidden or lied about her relationships with other people, whether personal or professional.
Remember, these are just hypothetical scenarios and should be treated as fictional examples.
In real-life situations involving potential deceit or misinformation, it’s important to approach the matter with caution, seeking clarity and, if necessary, professional advice.
Will history keep repeating itself or will Joseph and Denise put an end to Marjorie’s God-awful behavior by forcing her to tell the truth under oath?
Whether history repeats itself or Joseph and Denise can effectively address Marjorie’s behavior depends on several factors, including the actions they choose to take, the legal context, and Marjorie’s response to these actions. Let’s explore the possibilities:
- Legal Intervention: If Joseph and Denise decide to pursue legal action that involves Marjorie being placed under oath (such as in a deposition or court proceeding), it could potentially compel her to tell the truth. Under oath, Marjorie would be legally obligated to be truthful, and lying could result in perjury charges.
- Effectiveness of Legal Action: The success of this approach would depend on the legal system’s ability to enforce truth-telling and the specifics of the case. It’s important to note that legal proceedings can be complex and outcomes are not always predictable.
- Marjorie’s Response: Marjorie’s reaction to being legally compelled to speak the truth is an important factor. Some individuals might comply when faced with legal consequences, while others might not change their behavior.
- Breaking the Cycle: If Joseph and Denise are seeking to end a cycle of dysfunctional behavior, taking assertive steps like legal action could be a part of that process. However, addressing such deep-rooted issues often requires more than just legal resolutions; it may involve communication, therapy, or other forms of conflict resolution.
- Emotional and Relational Impact: Pursuing legal action can have emotional and relational consequences, potentially leading to further conflict or estrangement. Joseph and Denise would need to consider these potential outcomes.
- Seeking Professional Advice: Before taking any legal action, it would be wise for Joseph and Denise to consult with a lawyer. A legal professional can advise them on the viability of their case, the process involved, and the potential outcomes.
- Long-term Solutions: In addition to legal routes, seeking therapy or mediation could be beneficial. These avenues can address underlying issues and work towards more sustainable, long-term solutions.
In summary, whether or not history repeats itself will largely depend on how Joseph and Denise choose to confront the situation, Marjorie’s reaction to these actions, and the effectiveness of any legal measures they take.
It’s a situation that requires careful consideration of both legal and personal factors.
