Kelley Golay Steps Up To Assist Janette In Defending Her Lawsuit.
- Will Charmelle demand her lawyer file a motion; to join Kelley as co-defendant or to dismiss action for failure to join an indispensable party?
- Will the Puka party attempt to join David Taylor for allowing Marjorie and Denise to offer Joseph 612 property as future inheritance.
- Kelley did not join the open invitation to the Powers v. Puka conference call.
Joseph intends on winning the Powers V. Puka lawsuit by using the Luke 8:17 principle to it’s fullest reasonable extent of revealing ALL.
Joseph does not intend on winning by hiding the ball or playing clever games with technicalities.
Why Does Kelley Golay Want Access To A Document Joseph Controls?
Kelley requests a document from Joseph, which consolidates six proposals from different individuals into one.
This document was intended to put an end to a baseless lawsuit that lacked legitimacy since its inception.
After Joseph sold his 413 house and accepted Marjorie’s gift of the 612 property, Janette, Charmelle, and Kelley (JCK) make unlawful demands of Joseph.
Ultimately, it appears prima facie that JCK conspired to carry out a plan of extorting money from Marjorie’s trust or Kevin.
See also: Give Janette Money Or Marjorie Will Keep Hurting Andrea — Did Joseph Have A Choice?
Now that Joseph has made his lawsuit intention clear to JCK, it appears as if Kelley may believe this document contains a silver bullet.
If you review this document carefully, you’ll see Joseph’s intention is summed up on the first page.
The Only Offer Was For Everyone To WIN Or No Deal
- Offer #1 – Honor original promises that compelled Joseph and Lucinda to move into Marjorie’s 612 property. Joseph also offers Janette and Charmelle $60,000 cash (profits from 413 property) to honor his original contract. Janette refuses $30,000 cash and Charmelle refuses $30,000 cash.
- Offer #2 – Apparently the trust isn’t set up for this as a realistic option. The question, why is this the one provision of the trust that Marjorie, Janette, and Charmelle actually listen to? Why was breaking Joseph’s contract and disinheriting Denise the “best” option for the Puka clan?
- Offer #3 – Fusion of Kevin + John Martin’s idea. This idea only works if Denise is not disinherited.
- Offer #4 – Kevin’s idea. Kevin didn’t want money coming out of Kevin’s bank account to pay for Marjorie’s contractual obligations. Kevin requests Joseph add this to offers to see if the Trust will mortgage the house.
- Offer #5 – This offer is Marjorie, Janette, and Charmelle’s — not Joseph’s. Why would any reasonable person trash a multiple six figure contract/inheritance.
Offer #1 and offer #3 appear to be the only offers that allow everyone to feel as if they’ve won.
Offer one and three can stop the Powers v. Puka lawsuit from requiring formal litigation in district and appellate court.
How To Stop Joseph From Filing Lawsuit
Restore original promise.
How To Stop Denise From Filing Lawsuit
Restore original promise.
Charmelle’s Counter Offer – Lawyer Brooke Redmond Approved
Counteroffer to option three
Buy house #1 (612 Northern Pine Ct.)
Current home value: $372,780.00 (market analysis by Gem State Realty).
Powers family purchases home for $354,141.00 (5% discount-no realtor commission) cash and pays half of the closing costs (2% of purchase price) in the amount of $3,541.00. All proceeds paid to The Marge Puka Irrevocable Trust.
Counteroffer to option five
*** Vacate 612 Norther Pine Ct. ***
charmelle’s counter offer states:
reimburse the puka private annuity trust account in the full amount that was taken for personal use….
interesting as I emailed marge puka of my intentions and told her that i withdrew that money to protect it from the preying hands of janette and charmelle and never for my personal use and it was all deposited back into that account.
my question is:
did charmelle reimburse the puka private annuity trust the $5000 that was given to her or did she greedily keep that money for herself?
denise honors marge pukas request but charmelle did not