—-

Link to the written Timeline Of Events in the Powers v. Puka lawsuit.

Below is a Visual Timeline Of Events.

—-

Silence Is Their God, Unless They’re The Accuser

To this date, Marjorie, Charmelle Puka, and Janette Golay have not responded to any legal inquiries.

On October 14, 2023, we’ll remember that one year ago, Marjorie Puka, Janette Golay, Charmelle Puka frivolously chose to engage lawyer(s) against Joseph Powers, Lucinda Nevarez, and Denise Powers without discussing the problem at hand – like a normal family would of and could of — sat down at the kitchen table about talked about the concerns.

Their first move against Joseph Powers, were unilateral demands from lawyers and they threated us with a lawsuit if we did not comply to their sham ultimatums.

• For some reason, they think that when they’re suing us, it’s called “fixing the family.” Yet, when the tables turn and we sue them, the idea of family unity becomes inconceivable.
• In their eyes, taking legal action against us is their way of “repairing family bonds.” But when we opt to take the same path against them, the concept of family togetherness disappears.
• They seem to perceive their lawsuit against us as a means to “reunite the family.” However, when we choose to counter-sue, any semblance of family harmony is ruled out when we eventually realized we could counter sue because our lawyer Kara recently was actively worked on an Idaho Supreme Court Case — Darrow v. White – Opinion Filed: June 27, 2023  — involving a similar dispute of specific contested trust provisions via statutory law explain in our Powers v. Puka — NOTICE OF INTENTION TO FILE SUIT — sent via email and certified USPS. All . (Image here).
• It appears as if they can only have friendly relations with those they have absolute power over. We are apparently their servant who are lucky to receive their table scraps.

The only response we’ve received since Charmelle Puka’s interesting list of charges against Denise, was Janette Golay responding to Denise approximately eight (8) months later.

Janette’s reply involved her claiming that we’re lying, yet, she has not done a single thing to prove her claim.

As of this writing, I’ve attempted to communicate with Marjorie, Charmelle, and Janette dozens upon dozens of times (via text, email, phone call, voice message, letter in the mail, public blog posting) – all of which was met with stone cold silence.

All of them refuse to utter a single word that does not further advance their twisted perception of reality.

If they were truly in all honesty and good faith, telling the truth, do you think they could muster up a half a drop of courage to come forward (even a half an inch) to respond to at least one of my valid questions that tests the validity of the truth and reality of any of their allegations? 

You’d think that if someone had clean hands, they’d be broadcasting the truth from on top of a mountain, as I’m doing here with my documenting of the Powers v. Puka lawsuit, publicly.

However, this is simply the opposite of what they’re doing.

I can think of at least potential 10 reason why they could be refusing to communicate of even reply to this Family Dispute before it escalated to court.

The truth about this entire lawsuit process is that they only respond if you’re advancing their agenda.

Cold dead silence is their only answer otherwise.

If you say anything that does not align with their unilateral motives forward, they block you and somehow blame us for blocking them?

The following letter sent to Joseph Powers, by Charmelle Puka, claims that Denise told upward of 15 lies. In the letter below, Charmelle also hints at her belief that Denise killed her daughter who was on hospice.

Upon questioning or simply challenging Charmelle about these alleged lies, the only response, was total black out silence.

The reason for this blog series documenting the Powers v. Puka lawsuit is due to their stubbornly persistent 100% stone cold silence.

Line-By-Line Reply To Charmelle Puka’s Feb 25 Denise Accusations

—

Feb 25, 2023

Subject: From Charmelle

Hey Joey,

Just wanted to send this letter to you as grandma is concerned and worried.

Response: Thank you for communicating grandma’s concerns. It’s always valuable to gather multiple perspectives before forming a judgment.

I hate to bring things up but we are hoping that Denise will get the help she needs.

Response: I appreciate your concern for Denise. Sometimes, it’s essential to make sure we’re not projecting our feelings or experiences onto others and genuinely listening to their needs.

We talked to Kevin about our concerns and he agreed that there is something wrong with Denise.

Response: It’s good to involve family, but let’s be cautious. Everyone has their battles, and it’s important to approach the situation with empathy rather than assumptions.

He mentioned something along the line that she knows but can’t help what she does.

Response: While it’s crucial to acknowledge Kevin’s viewpoint, it’s equally important to remember that understanding a situation fully often requires us to look beyond surface-level observations.

Kevin mentioned Denise was taking some medication for a short time and it made her a totally different person, she was nice.

Response: Medications can have varied effects on people. Let’s be careful not to simplify or misinterpret her experiences based on short-term observations.

She quit taking it as it was not good for her.

Response: We should respect Denise’s choices about her health. We might not be privy to all the reasons behind her decisions.

Grandma mentioned to Denise one evening that she needs help and Denise replied that she did not and she denied about taking any medication before.

Response: It’s essential to approach topics like this with sensitivity. Perhaps there’s more to the story that we’re not aware of. Assumptions can sometimes cloud our perceptions.

Denise will tell stories like how she wants them to be told.

Response: Everyone has their way of expressing their experiences and feelings. Instead of jumping to conclusions, let’s try to create a space where she feels comfortable sharing more openly.

You know she shared with me that Kelley had an affair on Janette years ago.

Response: That’s a serious claim. It’s essential to approach such allegations with caution and ensure we have the full story before forming opinions or sharing further.

Why would you go around telling people that when you don’t know the story?

Response: I completely agree. Sharing unverified or sensitive information can be harmful and create misunderstandings. We should always be cautious and empathetic in our communications.

It’s like she wants that to be true maybe because she had guilt for what she had done herself? Who knows? Kelley did NOT have an affair and he is very open to talk about what happened.

Response: It’s a relief to hear Kelley’s side and his openness to discuss the matter. Speculating about Denise’s motives isn’t productive, but understanding Kelley’s perspective is vital.

He worked in an office. Developed feelings that were not right. Talked to Janette about it and quit that job. So Denise LIED.

Response: Kelley’s transparency and decision to address the situation head-on is commendable. It’s unfortunate that misinformation has spread, but it’s essential to set the record straight.

Denise is now telling grandma that no one benefitted from you living in her home but grandma.

Response: Misunderstandings can arise, but it’s evident that multiple parties, including yourself, had reasons and benefits for the living arrangement. Clear communication is key.

Well, Denise wanted you out of your Jerome home as it was full of mold and there was all those stray cats and Amrita couldn’t play outside.

Response: Denise’s concerns seem rooted in genuine worries for well-being. However, context matters, and decisions should be based on the collective good.

Denise would say that it now takes the burden off of Kevin trying to find you a house. So why is she saying Grandma is the only one who benefitted? LIE again.

Response: There seem to be discrepancies in Denise’s statements. It’s crucial to approach her and discuss these inconsistencies for clarity.

When you moved into Grandmas home Denise was saying to all of us that Kevin was going to buy the home.

Response: That’s a significant detail. If promises or plans were communicated, it’s vital to verify and ensure everyone is on the same page.

Then she made up an excuse why Kevin couldn’t.

Response: Situations can change, but open communication and transparency are essential to avoid misunderstandings.

Denise also said that their investor friend was interested in buying it then Kevin would pay him full market value rent. LIE again.

Response: It’s disappointing to hear about these inconsistencies. Addressing this directly with Kevin and Denise might help in getting to the bottom of it.

Kevin told Grandma and I he never said he would buy the home or pay fair market value rent.

Response: It sounds like Kevin has been straightforward about his intentions. It’s essential to consider every perspective before drawing conclusions.

Denise had you move in quickly before Janette found out as she didn’t want her to know how cheap you would be living there for.

It’s important to remember that everyone’s perception of urgency differs. Perhaps Denise had reasons for making that decision which we might not fully understand. Before passing judgment, consider the various possible motivations she might have had.

Denise was going to tell Janette that Kevin bought the home. So she was going to LIE. So obviously she knew it wasn’t the right thing to be doing if she had to LIE.

Miscommunication can happen in families, and sometimes people might withhold or alter information with intentions that they believe are for the best. Instead of labeling actions quickly, it could be useful to dig deeper into why Denise felt that was a necessary course of action.

Why does Denise feel the need to stalk grandmas whereabouts on her phone?

Sometimes, concern can manifest in ways that may seem invasive. Before labeling Denise’s actions as “stalking,” it might be worth understanding if her intentions were rooted in genuine concern for grandma.

Why did Denise take grandmas phone and block someone without grandma knowing?

Actions that might seem intrusive on the surface can sometimes be done out of protective instincts. Rather than assuming malicious intent, consider discussing with Denise directly to understand her reasons.

Why did Denise ask me to snoop through Grandmas phone? Lots of others but I won’t get into that… Denise has been doing weird things like this since Racheal was in high school. Invading peoples privacy.

It’s important not to let past experiences cloud judgment on current situations. While you might have reservations about Denise’s actions, understanding the “why” behind them might provide a different perspective. Addressing your concerns directly might lead to clarity.

Recently Denise was talking crap about me on Grandmas Facebook page.

Social media can sometimes be a platform where emotions get the best of people. Before reacting, consider that there might be underlying emotions or circumstances prompting Denise’s behavior. Open communication could help in addressing and resolving such misunderstandings.

She thought it was ok as she put a weird face emoji. I am not even on Facebook so I had no idea.

Interpreting tone and intent on social media can be challenging. Relying on emojis for context can sometimes lead to misunderstandings. It might be helpful to not rely solely on online interactions to gauge someone’s true feelings.

Courtney informed me as it was not right.

While it’s helpful to be informed by others, it’s essential to remember that everyone has their own lens of interpretation. Making decisions or judgments based on second-hand information might not always provide the complete picture.

Grandma didn’t tell me as she said she just ignored it. It was about how grandma is diabetic now.

Grandma’s choice to ignore certain things indicates her way of handling situations. Perhaps it’s a moment to reflect on what battles to pick and which ones to let go.

Denise was saying how she supports grandma 100% and I did not.

Support can manifest in various ways. Just because someone vocalizes their support more doesn’t necessarily mean they’re more supportive. It’s worth reflecting on the tangible ways you’ve shown your care and concern for grandma.

She was saying that I have a freezer full of ice cream and a pantry full of candy.

Everyone has their own preferences when it comes to food. Instead of focusing on what’s in your pantry, perhaps reflect on the balance and variety you provide in your meals.

I cook bad. She was saying I should be fired and Grandma needs to eat Denise’s food not mine. Her food is healthy and mine is not.

Tastes are subjective. If you feel confident about your cooking, then that’s what matters most. It’s essential to focus on self-improvement rather than getting caught up in external critiques.

So Grandma let me post something and I set the story straight!

It’s always good to voice your perspective, but remember that social media might not always be the best platform for personal matters.

Denise assumes too much and has NO idea what goes on here.

Assumptions can be misleading. Rather than focusing on Denise’s perceived assumptions, focus on open communication to ensure clarity.

First of all Grandma says she has eaten a certain way her whole life and is not going to change instantly, if at all.

Change, especially dietary, can be challenging for many. It’s crucial to understand and respect individual choices.

I had asked grandma to look for recipes and she does not want to.

Everyone’s readiness for change is different. Maybe it’s a time to reflect on how you can introduce subtle changes that grandma might be more receptive to.

Grandma herself will go to the store and bring home ice cream for her.

It’s essential to respect personal choices. Sometimes, it’s the small indulgences that bring joy.

She will get mocha drinks at McDonalds and come home and put more chocolate in it.

It’s all about balance. While it’s okay to indulge occasionally, maybe consider introducing her to alternative treats that are equally delicious but more nutritious.

She does not want to use sugar-free coffee creamer as it tastes bad, she herself wants to use the regular one.

Preferences are personal. Before being critical of choices, perhaps think about how you might have preferences that others might not understand.

Therefore even though grandma did not want to take her diabetic pills she is and needs to as she does not want to change her eating habits.

It’s essential to approach such sensitive health matters with understanding and empathy. Criticizing grandma’s choices might not be the best approach.

Denise needs to quit blaming me, it is grandma’s choice. Denise does not live here, she doesn’t know.

Pointing fingers and placing blame can further distance relationships. Maybe consider focusing on effective communication rather than who’s right or wrong.

Denise had recently told grandma that she will never have a relationship with me again as I complain too much.

Relationship dynamics are complex. It’s crucial to reflect on one’s actions and words and their potential impact on others.

She will never have a relationship with Janette as she twists stories around.

Making assumptions about others can be harmful. It might be worth assessing if there’s any truth to these perceptions before taking them at face value.

Yes, I complain. I would tell Denise that grandma sleeps in the living room chair all day and I feel like I can never do anything that would make noise.

Complaining might provide temporary relief, but it’s essential to understand its potential long-term implications on relationships.

I would complain that the dog poop never gets cleaned up outside.

Instead of complaining, perhaps finding proactive solutions could lead to a more positive atmosphere.

I would complain about her cat sleeping on my couch as I don’t like cat hair on furniture.

Expressing discomfort is valid, but it’s essential to approach it in a constructive manner.

Then I would complain about Dave. He leaves dirty dishes in the sink, etc., etc.

It might be helpful to express concerns directly and kindly, promoting open communication.

Well, Denise says that she doesn’t like to be around me due to that as I make her that way. LOL 

Considering how one’s actions and words might impact others can pave the way for improved relationships.

Denise has complained to be about all of you for years as far back as when Racheal was in high school. (That is as far back as I remember)

Recalling past grievances might not be productive. Reflecting on the present and working on improving future interactions can be more fruitful.

She also complains about Kevin. Some not very nice!! 

It’s vital to avoid indulging in or promoting negative talk about others.

Dave knows what I complain about him as I tell him. 

Open communication is essential, but it’s equally important to ensure it’s done with respect and kindness.

Should I tell Kevin what Denise says as she told Grandma everything I would complain about? 

Spreading hearsay can further strain relationships. Consider the potential outcomes and if it’s in the best interest of all involved.

Grandma actually already knew as I had told her. I would never tell Kevin as some would be very hurtful!

Communication is undoubtedly crucial, but it’s essential to reflect on whether you’re sharing information for the right reasons or if it might unintentionally spread negativity. Sometimes it’s better to address concerns directly with the person involved rather than involving others.

As far as Janette, Denise says she twists stories around is a LIE. 

While it’s clear you trust Janette’s perspective, remember that everyone has their viewpoint and understanding. Could there be some aspects you’re not aware of?

We have come to realize that Denise is the one who does that. Denise is the root to all the problems. It’s bizarre!!

It’s easy to pin problems on a single person. However, complex situations often involve multiple perspectives and dynamics. Have you tried seeing things from Denise’s perspective?

Oh, another thing Denise would say was that grandma created the trust all by herself while Denise sat in the corner and didn’t say a word. 

It’s worth noting that being present during an event doesn’t necessarily mean involvement. Before jumping to conclusions, have you tried asking Denise about her side of the story? Assumptions can often lead to misunderstandings.

David Taylor says otherwise. 

While it’s valuable to gather multiple perspectives, relying solely on third-party opinions can sometimes cloud judgment. It’s essential to ensure that you’re not only hearing what you want to hear.

Denise created Grandma’s trust while grandma sat there. Denise LIES again.

Consider the possibility that there could have been misunderstandings or miscommunications regarding the trust. Could there be any reasons why Denise might see things differently?

Denise is also now blaming Grandma, Janette, and I that she could not spend Andrea’s final few months with her drama-free. 

Emotions run high during challenging times. It might be worth reflecting on whether there were any dynamics or actions that unintentionally contributed to the tension.

Janette messaged her a couple of times telling Denise to put this aside and focus on Andrea. 

Reaching out is a commendable effort, but it’s also important to question if the approach was the most helpful or if it added to Denise’s stress during what might have been a difficult time.

She didn’t though and continued to harass us while we pretty much didn’t respond. Denise made it worse, not us.

Sometimes, silence can be perceived as agreement or even antagonism. Are there ways this could have been addressed more openly?

Sorry for the long letter. 

Apologizing for expressing yourself can sometimes indicate a lack of confidence in your stance. Have you taken the time to introspect and analyze your feelings and motivations behind this letter?

My point is that Denise lies a lot or should I say tells stories how she wants them to be. 

Perception and memory can be subjective. Before labeling someone as a liar, consider whether there might be differences in understanding or recall.

Then she believes her own stories. 

People tend to believe in their perspectives, just as you believe in yours. The key is to find a way to foster understanding rather than focusing on who’s right or wrong.

How she snoops on people also is so weird. 

People have different boundaries and ways of showing concern. While snooping is not ideal, have you tried understanding why she might do it?

We have researched disorders and something is for sure wrong with her. 

Diagnosing someone without professional expertise can be harmful and misconstrued. It’s essential to approach such matters with caution and empathy.

Grandma thinks she has got worse just recently. 

If there are genuine concerns about Denise’s wellbeing, consider approaching it with genuine concern rather than judgment.

I hope you are open to seeing that these facts I have stated are not right. 

Facts and perceptions can be distinct. It’s crucial to ensure that conclusions aren’t drawn merely on interpretations.

She needs help. 

If you genuinely believe Denise needs assistance, consider encouraging her to seek professional help in a supportive manner.

It’s sad that she is in denial. 

People process things at their own pace. It’s vital to offer support rather than label someone as being in denial.

It is also sad that Racheal says she knows the truth which is only what she hears from Denise.

It’s essential to understand that everyone forms opinions based on the information and experiences available to them. Have you ever taken a moment to provide Racheal with your side of the story or have a constructive conversation with her? Sometimes, we need to step out of our comfort zones to bridge understanding.

Kevin had told us that he wanted to bring this up to Denise as he knows there is something wrong but to give her time as Andrea had just passed. 

It’s commendable that Kevin wants to approach a situation with sensitivity, especially after a significant event like Andrea’s passing. However, have you considered the possibility that your perceptions and reactions might be clouded by your emotions? Taking a moment to reflect on your own assumptions and actions can often provide a clearer view of a complex situation.

Grandma is worried as Denise is getting worse and needs help.

If there are genuine concerns about Denise’s health and well-being, consider seeking professional advice or intervention, always coming from a place of care and concern.

I think I briefly told you about Grandma’s Az house before. 

Memory can be a tricky thing. Before diving into details, it might be helpful to ensure you have all the facts straight. Just as you’re relying on your memories and perceptions, others might have their own versions too.

Denise says Janette wanted to buy it at cost and that’s a lie. 

We all can fall prey to the game of ‘Chinese whispers’ at times. Before drawing conclusions, have you tried discussing the matter directly with both Denise and Janette to hear their perspectives?

Denise says that Janette approached Grandma and that is also a lie. 

Understand that the narrative one shares can sometimes be based on their understanding or even misunderstandings. It’s beneficial to consider the possibility that everyone might not have the complete picture.

Grandma was the one that approached Janette and asked her is her and Kelley would be interested in buying it at what her and Grandpa paid. 

While it’s great that you trust Grandma’s version of events, it’s equally important to remember that each individual may interpret a situation differently based on their viewpoint.

She knew that Janette and Kelley enjoyed going there and were interested in maybe living in Az someday. 

Financial decisions can be quite personal. It’s wise to ensure that such sensitive matters are handled delicately without making presumptions.

Janette said she didn’t think her and Kelley could afford it but she would talk to Kelley and put a pencil to it. 

Before placing blame, consider whether you’ve genuinely heard all sides of the story. Everyone has their reasons and interpretations.

Blaming Janette and telling how it happened all wrong. 

Before placing blame, consider whether you’ve genuinely heard all sides of the story. Everyone has their reasons and interpretations.

I didn’t live here and had no idea what the story was. 

If you weren’t directly involved, it might be beneficial to tread cautiously when speaking on the matter. Understanding that you’re hearing second-hand or even third-hand accounts can help in gauging the situation more neutrally.

Only Denise calling me and telling me Janette wants to buy moms house for too cheap. 

It’s natural to want to trust family, but it’s also essential to realize that emotional states can sometimes color one’s perceptions. Instead of taking everything at face value, it might be helpful to gather more firsthand information.

I seen all the text messages and that conversation. 

Texts can be interpreted in various ways, especially without the nuances of tone or facial expression. Always consider the context and the relationship dynamics when reading into such exchanges.

Once again Denise assumes and is wrong. 

Everyone can make assumptions at times. Before concluding that someone is always wrong, it might be more productive to find ways to bridge the communication gap and encourage open dialogues.

I think that it is awful how Denise calls and emails Janette’s work and tries to get her fired not once but twice! 

It’s essential to approach situations like these with a calm mindset. Before jumping to conclusions, consider the possibility that there might be underlying reasons or even misunderstandings that led to such actions. Have you tried discussing this with Denise directly?

Grandma asked Denise what was going on about Adam and what he said to me. 

Personal matters can be sensitive, especially within families. Remember that everyone might have a slightly different perspective based on their interactions and experiences.

Denise said she doesn’t want to get involved. 

Respecting boundaries is crucial. Perhaps Denise felt that getting involved could escalate the situation or maybe she felt it wasn’t her place.

Well, she should be involved as that is her daughter and what Adam said to me was wrong! 

Although it’s natural to seek support, one can’t force another to get involved. It’s equally important to ensure that you’ve evaluated the situation from all angles.

Unless Racheal has an open marriage and allows Adam to cheat on her. ?? None of my business…

It’s wise to recognize when certain topics are outside your purview. Interpersonal relationships, especially marriages, can be incredibly complex, and it’s generally best not to make assumptions.

I still stand by what I was saying about Andrea 100%.

Trusting in your convictions is admirable. Still, ensure that your beliefs are based on firsthand knowledge and not just perceptions. 

I know what I seen, what Andrea was telling me and the hospice nurse. 

Memories can be subject to interpretation. Just as you have your experiences, others may have their own perspectives that differ.

You claimed that Denise was trying to kill her own daughter. Forgive me if I’m not ready to believe you at the drop of a hat that my mother is trying to kill her own daughter. Andrea was on hospice. Meaning most people on hospice pass away within six months of entering hospice.

If the hospice nurse wants to deny it as she and the company will get into trouble then so be it. 

While it’s understandable that you might feel wronged, it’s essential to remember that professionals, like hospice nurses, operate under strict guidelines and protocols. 

Before making allegations, consider the possibility that there might be information or perspectives you might not be privy to. 

Making assumptions or drawing conclusions without all the facts can sometimes lead to unnecessary misunderstandings and tensions.

I am shocked how Denise and Racheal talked to Janette, Grandma and myself. It’s devastating and my heart hurts. 

Emotions can cloud judgment. Before drawing any conclusions, consider having an open conversation with all involved to gain clarity and potentially find common ground.

Denise messaged grandma recently telling her that she is not allowed to say anything negative or Denise will pull away from her. 

Everyone has boundaries. However, communication is key to understanding and addressing any underlying issues.

But yet Denise can go around and talk all the crap wants??? 

Consider approaching Denise with empathy, trying to understand her side, and addressing the perceived discrepancies in behavior.

Hmmm Grandma asked her does that include Racheal and Joe and Denise replied just Grandma cant talk negative. Racheal is allowed to though!! 

Relationships can be multifaceted. It’s possible there are dynamics at play that you may not be aware of. Encourage direct communication between the parties involved.

When Kelley went into John Martins office and was mad and yelling. 

Secondhand accounts can be misinterpreted or lack context. Before forming opinions, ensure you have all the facts.

Denise tells the story that Kelley went in there yelling at John Martin because Kelley through a toddler fit and didn’t get the $400,000. 

Remember that each person might tell a story based on their understanding or perspective. Encourage open dialogue to clear misunderstandings and foster better relationships.

Lie not true it was just what Denise assumed happened. 

It’s essential to approach situations with an open mind and not rush to conclusions based on assumptions. 

Just as you feel Denise might be making assumptions, it’s equally important to ensure that you’re not doing the same. 

Engaging in constructive conversations, rather than making accusations, can help in clarifying misunderstandings and reaching a better understanding of the situation.

Then you have Racheal commenting about that and believes Denise. 

It’s essential to remember that everyone is entitled to their own beliefs and understanding of situations. Just as you have your viewpoint, Racheal is also allowed hers based on her experiences and interactions.

Then there was when John Martin was trying to come up with a fair deal with the house issue. 

It’s great that there was an attempt to find a resolution. However, when there are many parties involved, narratives can become intertwined and sometimes misconstrued.

John Martin suggested $400,000 to each Janette and I. 

Perhaps Denise received a different version or understanding of the situation. Have you tried to have a clear conversation with her about this?

Denise even called me telling me that was Janette’s idea. NO, it was all John Martins idea.

It’s essential to approach situations with evidence and a calm demeanor to avoid miscommunication.

David Taylor can even confirm that idea was Johns. 

If that’s the case, perhaps it might be beneficial to have a sit-down with everyone involved, including David Taylor, to set the record straight.

Even with us all telling her it was Johns idea she would still say it was Janette’s. 

It’s possible that Denise has her reasons for believing so. Communication is key in such scenarios.

She assumes again then believes her own story. 

Perception is a powerful thing. Sometimes people develop a belief based on their interpretation, even if it’s different from what others perceive.

It’s so bizzar!! She assumes things then believes that and won’t change her mind even with others telling her otherwise and we have proof! 

Sometimes, even when presented with evidence, individuals may have difficulty adjusting their viewpoints. Emotions and past experiences can heavily influence how one perceives a situation.

The disorders we have looked into says the person who has it won’t acknowledge it. 

It’s crucial not to jump to conclusions or diagnose someone based on limited observations. Such matters are best left to professionals.

I told you when grandma told her she needs help that she doesn’t think anything is wrong with her. 

Everyone has their journey and understanding of self. Pushing someone before they’re ready to acknowledge a situation can sometimes create more resistance. It’s essential to approach with empathy and patience.